Liquid Architecture is an Australian organisation for artists working with sound. LA investigates the sounds themselves, but also the ideas communicated about, and the meaning of, sound and listening.
Our program stages encounters and creates spaces for sonic experience, and critical reflection on sonority and systems of sonic affect. To do this, we host experiences at the intersection of contemporary art and experimental music, supporting artists to produce performances and concerts, exhibitions, talks, reading groups, workshops and recordings in art spaces, music venues and other sites.
Liquid Architecture is curatorially driven and our methodology embraces research, collaborations and imaginations. We want to echo beyond local conversations, problems, debates and questions, to reverberate across media and disciplines, and so to sound out new discourses about the audible world, and beyond.
We acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as the first sovereign owners of this unceded country. We pay our respects to their Elders, past, present and becoming.
Liquid Architecture is a non-profit cultural organisation with Deductible Gift Recipient (DGR) status. We support artists working with sound.
Your support helps us instigate more programs, conduct more research, stage more extensive experiments and more exchanges with artists, and generate more dialogue. And more sound.
PO Box 12315
LIQUID ARCHITECTURE SOUND INC
Liquid Architecture (LA) is committed to protecting the privacy and security of personal information obtained and stored about its audience or clientele, including users of this website. We understand and appreciate that our audience or clientele and users of this website are concerned about their privacy and the confidentiality and security of any information that may be provided to us.
HOW PERSONAL INFORMATION IS COLLECTED
LA collects personal information in a variety of different ways depending on the type of contact that is made with the organisation. LA may also collect personal information over the phone, in person or by electronic correspondence in order to undertake its regular administrative operations.
The following are examples of how personal information may be collected by the organisation:
- Subscribing to LA’s e-newsletter via the website, in-person or other means
- Registering for LA’s programs of events (eg. performances, workshops, lectures)
- Purchasing a ticket for LA’s programs of events via a ticketing system
- Making an online enquiry
- Making an individual donation to LA
- Becoming a sponsor
- Submitting a proposal to LA
- Providing written feedback to LA
- If you become a LA Associate, Volunteer or Board Member
WHY PERSONAL INFORMATION IS COLLECTED
LA collects personal information in order to service the needs of its audience or clientele. All details are kept secure at all times and any individual may request their information is not used for direct marketing, research or any other purpose. If you opt-in to become a LA e-newsletter subscriber you are giving us permission to send you information about upcoming programs and services offered by LA and its partners and your details may be retained and used for the following purposes:
- To make recommendations to visitors about other services that LA offers that may be of interest
- Notifying changes of program details
- To market upcoming events
- For market research purposes
- To market online services
vFor such further and other lawful uses in connection with LA’s activities consistent with this Privacy Statement
DISCLOSURE OF PERSONAL INFORMATION
LA will not sell, lend, disclose, or give personal information of its audience or clientele to external individuals or organisations without first obtaining the customer’s consent, unless required by law. LA may, however, contact the audience on behalf of other organisations to offer information regarding their products. These organisations may include, but are not limited to other arts organisations or government departments.
KEEP PERSONAL INFORMATION ACCURATE
LA is committed to ensuring all personal information it collects is accurate, complete and up-to-date. However, the accuracy of this personal information to a large extent depends on the information provided by its clients. LA asks that all clients:
advise us if you become aware of any errors in your personal information.
advise of any changes in their personal details, such as address, email address and phone number.
The LA website contains links to other sites. LA is not responsible for the privacy practices of other sites. LA encourages users when they leave the site to read the privacy statements of each and every web site that collects personal information. This privacy statement applies solely to the activities of LA
ONLINE COLLECTION NON-PERSONAL INFORMATION
When you look at this website, our Internet Service Provider makes a record of your visit and logs the following information for statistical purposes only – the user’s server address, the user’s top level domain name (for example .com, .gov, .au, etc), the date and time of the visit to the site, the pages accessed and documents downloaded, the previous site visited, and the type of browser used. No attempt is, or will be, made to identify users browsing activities except, in the unlikely event of an investigation, where a law enforcement agency may exercise a warrant to inspect activity logs.
DATA ACCESS AND FURTHER INFORMATION
Earwitness: Jennifer Stoever, M J Grant and Andrew Brooks
Cnr Oxford St and Greens Rd
UNSW Galleries is proud to present an evening of talks by and conversation with Jennifer Stoever, M J Grant and Andrew Brooks as part of Eavesdropping, a major project by Liquid Architecture, Melbourne Law School and The Ian Potter Museum of Art exploring the politics of listening and being listened-to.
Jennifer Stoever — The Sonic Color Line
We need to talk about listening, power, and race. Willful white mishearings and auditory imaginings of blackness — often state sanctioned — have long been a matter of life and death in the United States. However, recent events— and large-scale protests testifying to their occurrence and amplifying their impact — have temporarily halted the usual silence surrounding the violent consequences of the racialization of both sound and listening. In this talk, Dr Stoever will speak to some of these events in relation to what she calls the ‘sonic color line’, the learned cultural mechanism that establishes racial difference through listening habits and uses sound to communicate one’s position vìs-a-vìs white citizenship.
M J Grant — Harm and Harmony
Although it has come to widespread public attention only through methods used by US security agencies in the“War on Terror”, the uses of music in torture and ill-treatment are much more extensive, both in the present and in the past. In Europe from the Middle Ages onwards, many formal and informal practices of justice made reference to musical tropes, particularly the contrast between harmony and dissonance. Traditions of public shaming which folklorists and historical anthropologists have gathered under the general term“charivari” generally incorporated a cacophony of noises. Some aspects of these practices resonate in rituals used in military justice in the eighteenth and nineteenth century: military justice and discipline seem in turn to have informed the ways that music has been used both in the Soviet Gulag and, even more extensively, in the context of Nazi persecution and genocide.
Andrew Brooks — Fugitive Listening
The question and problem of who is afforded a voice — of what voices are heard as speech and what voices are heard as noise — is connected to the history of the modern subject. This lecture will consider the transformation of the voice into an ideal object that comes to represent the liberal subject of post-Enlightenment thought. Separated from the corporeal noises of the body, the voice of the liberal subject is dematerialised and transformed into a static image of sound that is both illusory and impossible. Despite its phantasmagorical nature, this idealised voice that speaks in the form of a univocal demand is inextricably linked to the liberal ideologies of possession and accumulation that underpin the logics of settler colonialism and its shifting forms of racialisation. Against the idealised voice of liberalism, we might open our ears to the noisy voices and fugitive modes of speech that sound outside the locus of the politics proper. Listening in to moments in pop music, the murmur of crowds, the urgent whispers of a gossip network, and active silence, this lecture proposes a type of fugitive listening that attends to voices historically excluded from the political sphere.Eavesdropping, a collaboration between Liquid Architecture, Melbourne Law School and the Ian Potter Museum of Art, comprising an exhibition, a public program, series of working groups and touring event exploring the politics of listening through work by artists, researchers, writers and activists from Australia and around the world.
“Gossip is dependent on the reproduction and performance of social practices rather than the acquisition of ‘factual’ knowledge, and so relies on and works to produce bonds of intimacy and standards of trust. This is not to claim that gossip only trades in falsity, indeed, it often trades in important factual information. Yet its performative structure — ‘have you heard?’ — is one that foregrounds dialogical relations, interaction and, ultimately, multi-vocality.”
“We need to talk about listening, power, and race. Willful white mishearings and auditory imaginings of blackness— often state-sanctioned— have long been a matter of life and death in the United States.”
“[Some] organisations and musicians who initially spearheaded the public outcry against music torture have increasingly laid down their banners in the period since Obama came to power. At best we can blame this on a lack of knowledge and understanding about the general scale of the problem. The more cynical view would be that for many who were so outraged, it was the perceived attack on music rather than on the tortured individual which was the real motivation for their actions.”
Alice Hui-Sheng Chang
Amanda Stewart and Jim Denley
Anna Homler AKA Breadwoman
Anthony Lyons and Paul Fletcher
Antoinette J. Citizen
Antonia Sellbach with Julie Burleigh and Alison Bolger
Atlanta Eke and Daniel Jenatsch
Beth Sometimes & Caroline Anderson
Bhenji Ra x Del Lumanta x Daryl Prondoso
Black Quantum Futurism
Brian Fuata x Enderie
Bryan Phillips AKA Galambo
COCO SOLID AKA Jess Hansell
Catherine Clover and Peter Knight
Chloe Alison Escott
Christopher LG Hill
Chun Yin Rainbow Chan
Clare Milledge and Tom Smith
Clocks and Clouds
Collingwood College Sound Collective
12 dog cycle
David Shea and Kristi Monfries
Dennis Del Favero
Dirk de Buyn
Sonia Leber and David Chesworth
Eric Demetriou and Herbert Jercher
Evelyn Araluen Corr
Evelyn Ida Morris
Faene (Corin x Ju Ca)
Fayen d’Evie and Jen Bervin with Bryan Phillips and Andy Slater
Feminist Theory Group
Fernando do Campo
Haco and Toshiya Tsunoda
Hannah Catherine Jones AKA Foxy Moron
Harriet Kate Morgan
Hi God People
Hyui Ines Rmi
Rosalind Hall and Dave Brown
Is There A Hotline?
id m thffft able
Dr James Parker
J'Ouvert Ft Makeda and The AM Trio - Ece Yavuz, Alvin Rostant and R
James Utting-Webb and Riley Lockett
Jenny Ruth Barnes
Joanna Anderson & Michael Prior
Johannes S. Sistermanns
Julia Drouhin and Pip Stafford
Anja Kanngieser and Daniel Jenatsch
Kalle Hamm and Dzamil Kamanger
Kalle Hamm and Lauri Ainala
Keith Fullerton Whitman
Lacking Sound Festival
Lawrence Abu Hamdan
Lei Lei Kung
Leila El Rayes
Leila El Rayes x Poison
Lorna & Aunty Jenny Munro
Snack Syndicate (Andrew Brooks and Astrid Lorange)
Joseph Jordania and Nino Tsitsishvili with Melbourne Georgian Choir
M J Grant
Manus Recording Project Collective; Michael Green, André Dao, Jon Tjhia, Abdul Aziz Muhamat, Farhad Bandesh, Behrouz Boochani, Samad Abdul, Shamindan Kanapathi and Kazem Kazemi
Matthew P. Hopkins
Matthew P. Hopkins & Julie Burleigh
Media Lab Melbourne
Megan Alice Clune
Mehera San Roque
Misbach Daeng Bilok
Monica Monin & Astrid Lorange
Nathan John Thompson
Noel Meek and Olivia Webb
Peter Brötzmann and Heather Leigh
Pia Van Gelder
Plants and Animalia (CES and Felicity Mangan)
Poppy de Souza
Queens of the Circulating Library
Romy Seven Fox
Sally Ann McIntyre
Shi Chao Lai
Th Duo Trio
Thanh Hằng Phạm
The Charles Ives Singers
The Donkey's Tail
Ting Shuo Hear Say
Uncle Joe Kirk
Undine Sellbach & Stephen Loo
Ur 1st Luv
Ute Meta Bauer
Will Foster and Sabrina D’Angelo