Liquid Architecture is an Australian organisation for artists working with sound. LA investigates the sounds themselves, but also the ideas communicated about, and the meaning of, sound and listening.
Our program stages encounters and creates spaces for sonic experience, and critical reflection on sonority and systems of sonic affect. To do this, we host experiences at the intersection of contemporary art and experimental music, supporting artists to produce performances and concerts, exhibitions, talks, reading groups, workshops and recordings in art spaces, music venues and other sites.
Liquid Architecture is curatorially driven and our methodology embraces research, collaborations and imaginations. We want to echo beyond local conversations, problems, debates and questions, to reverberate across media and disciplines, and so to sound out new discourses about the audible world, and beyond.
We acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as the first sovereign owners of this unceded country. We pay our respects to their Elders, past, present and becoming.
PO Box 12315
LIQUID ARCHITECTURE SOUND INC
Liquid Architecture (LA) is committed to protecting the privacy and security of personal information obtained and stored about its audience or clientele, including users of this website. We understand and appreciate that our audience or clientele and users of this website are concerned about their privacy and the confidentiality and security of any information that may be provided to us.
HOW PERSONAL INFORMATION IS COLLECTED
LA collects personal information in a variety of different ways depending on the type of contact that is made with the organisation. LA may also collect personal information over the phone, in person or by electronic correspondence in order to undertake its regular administrative operations.
The following are examples of how personal information may be collected by the organisation:
- Subscribing to LA’s e-newsletter via the website, in-person or other means
- Registering for LA’s programs of events (eg. performances, workshops, lectures)
- Purchasing a ticket for LA’s programs of events via a ticketing system
- Making an online enquiry
- Making an individual donation to LA
- Becoming a sponsor
- Submitting a proposal to LA
- Providing written feedback to LA
- If you become a LA Associate, Volunteer or Board Member
WHY PERSONAL INFORMATION IS COLLECTED
LA collects personal information in order to service the needs of its audience or clientele. All details are kept secure at all times and any individual may request their information is not used for direct marketing, research or any other purpose. If you opt-in to become a LA e-newsletter subscriber you are giving us permission to send you information about upcoming programs and services offered by LA and its partners and your details may be retained and used for the following purposes:
- To make recommendations to visitors about other services that LA offers that may be of interest
- Notifying changes of program details
- To market upcoming events
- For market research purposes
- To market online services
vFor such further and other lawful uses in connection with LA’s activities consistent with this Privacy Statement
DISCLOSURE OF PERSONAL INFORMATION
LA will not sell, lend, disclose, or give personal information of its audience or clientele to external individuals or organisations without first obtaining the customer’s consent, unless required by law. LA may, however, contact the audience on behalf of other organisations to offer information regarding their products. These organisations may include, but are not limited to other arts organisations or government departments.
KEEP PERSONAL INFORMATION ACCURATE
LA is committed to ensuring all personal information it collects is accurate, complete and up-to-date. However, the accuracy of this personal information to a large extent depends on the information provided by its clients. LA asks that all clients:
advise us if you become aware of any errors in your personal information.
advise of any changes in their personal details, such as address, email address and phone number.
The LA website contains links to other sites. LA is not responsible for the privacy practices of other sites. LA encourages users when they leave the site to read the privacy statements of each and every web site that collects personal information. This privacy statement applies solely to the activities of LA
ONLINE COLLECTION NON-PERSONAL INFORMATION
When you look at this website, our Internet Service Provider makes a record of your visit and logs the following information for statistical purposes only – the user’s server address, the user’s top level domain name (for example .com, .gov, .au, etc), the date and time of the visit to the site, the pages accessed and documents downloaded, the previous site visited, and the type of browser used. No attempt is, or will be, made to identify users browsing activities except, in the unlikely event of an investigation, where a law enforcement agency may exercise a warrant to inspect activity logs.
DATA ACCESS AND FURTHER INFORMATION
Two Party State
ANNOUNCING: Liquid Architecture and Channels form a coalition with a mandate to party on September 26 at a summit at Schoolhouse Studios.
ENTERTAINMENT AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS COOPERATION COMMITTEE
Estimates SATURDAY, 26 SEPTEMBER 2015, 8:00pm-Midnight
BY AUTHORITY OF THE SENATE
Members in attendance:
MEMBERS FOR LIQUID ARCHITECTURE
The Hon Jennifer Walshe (Ireland), Milker Corporation, Central Authority
Mr Basic House (United Kingdom), Opal Tapes, Director-General
Sir Thomas William Smith (Australia), Strategic Policy and Coordination Group
MEMBERS FOR CHANNELS FESTIVAL
Mayor Kate Geck (Australia) Future Visions and Communication
The Hon. Zoe Scoglio (Australia) Temporary Ambassador of Deep-Time
Sarah Byrne, AO (Australia) Cultural Prosperity Division
Siying Zhou and Steven Rhall (Australia) Ministry for Natural Endowment
David Brazier and Kelda Free (Australia) National Border Consultants
Dr. Daniel McKewen (Australia) Economic Affairs
Lady Sabina Maselli, Judith Hamann and Adele Wilkes (Australia) Ministry for Interior-Exterior Relations
LIQUID ARCHITECTURE EXECUTIVE
Lord Joel Stern (Australia), Liquid Architecture, National Emergency Management
Princess Danni Zuvela (Australia), Liquid Architecture, Special Advisor to the President
Dame Anabelle Lacroix (France/Australia), Liquid Architecture, Transnational Cooperation
CHANNELS FESTIVAL EXECUTIVE
Lady Nikki Lam (Australia) Director, National Policy and Capability
Professor Anita Spooner (Australia) Executive Director Operations
Dr Melissa Edwards (Australia) Crisis Coordination
Outcome 1 — A deliberation on the existence of video and/or sound art as legitimately extant modalities for contemporary art-making/partying
Outcome 2 — A deliberation on the feasibility of such, with regard to the generation of a united cooperation in the form of a jointly-operated event (hereafter, “The Party”).
ACTING CHAIR: I will call the committee to order and I will call on Lord Stern to make an opening statement.
Senator Joel Stern: Yes. With reference to Outcome 1 –
CHAIR: That would be, “Outcome 1 — A deliberation on the existence of video and/or sound art as legitimately extant modalities for contemporary art-making/partying”,correct?
Senator JOEL STERN: Yes. We wish to question the existence of so-called “video art” in contemporary art.
CHAIR: Channels, you have been made aware of this enquiry on notice – do you have a response?
Senator ANITA SPOONER: Yes, we do. We wish to respond with a comment of our own which is that we would question the existence of so-called “sound art”. Or, actually, whether or not that term isn’t, in common parlance, a bit “meh”.
CHAIR: It would appear that this chamber may need to adjourn to consider these mutually inclusive inquiries.
Proceedings suspended from 09:06 until 09:26 [Discussion of medium specificity]
CHAIR: As both parties have agreed to disagree, it would appear that what is required is a feasibility study to determine the a) existence and b) viability of each art form. Does either organisation have a suggestion for how this study may be undertaken?
Senator DANNI ZUVELA: With respect to that, we would like to propose spectators be offered the chance to address this issue themselves in a suitable environment to make the determination; i.e. at a gig.
CHAIR: A what?
Senator ANABELLE LACROIX: A party!
Senator NIKKI LAM: We would like to propose a gig. Channels will demonstrate the feasibility and existence of video art at an event featuring music, dancing and general partying.
Senator JOEL STERN: That sounds more like sound art than video art.
Senator MELISSA EDWARDS: Except that we propose spectators are actually having a good time.
Senator DANNI ZUVELA: LA’s gig will feature artists interacting with video projections.
Senator ANITA SPOONER: That sounds more like video art to me, sorry.
Senator JOEL STERN: We would like to draw the chamber’s attention to our members – Jenny Walshe, Basic House and Tom Smith – who will put these queries to rest.
CHAIR: From this edifying exchange it is obvious to this chamber that in order to achieve Outcome 1, both parties will need to undertake a feasibility study into each other’s artform in the form of a jointly-operated warehouse party, featuring BOTH musical and video performance, BOTH live sound and installed video, and demonstrating – or disputing – the existence of BOTH sound art AND video art. Following the agenda, we will start with outcome 2, ‘united cooperation in the form of a jointly-operated event, known as the “Two Party State”).’. Deputy Chair, do you want to start off?
Senator ANABELLE LACROIX: Merci, Chair. There is an administrative issue that we have discussed, and I would be interested in the department or the minister’s views. I have sought that in future estimates we commence with the department proper and cross-portfolio matters rather than commencing with arts and then agencies. I understand that there has been a historical position on this committee that agencies appear first so that they have a bit more certainty about their timing. My own view, for what it is worth, is that I do not think that necessarily warrants waiting so long before we get to cross-portfolio-type matters—I think on the previous occasion it was not until about 9.15 pm. Is there a particular view on that point that you would like to represent?
Senator JOEL STERN: Anabelle, I think you are looking at the wrong document.
Senator ANABELLE LACROIX: Can you give us a page reference.
Senator JOEL STERN: Page 40.
Senator ANABELLE LACROIX: Are you talking about program 2.1?
Senator JOEL STERN: Yes.
CHAIR: So, the party is a feasibility study to determine the viability and existence of video and/or sound art?
ALL MEMBERS: Yes.
keywords: human algorithm; don’t renovate, detonate; seal of approval; cut the ribbon; pin the pennants, pop the corks; artrepeneurialism; double the flavour; memorandum of understanding; ministry of sound decisions; trickle-down affect; amidst the self-congratulation; surreal estate; intermodal summit; imitation cities; from zero; reflexive reflections; building a transparent mirror; coin the phrase; critical purchase; value harness; attention economy; best practice; leveraging; bonding.
Print material designed by U-P
Sonic adventurer who experiments with captivating rhythmic and textured techno.
Irish Dada-ist, composer and musical conceptualist, socially mediated / meditated performance art
attempts to capture the ludic, depersonalized, uncanny and frustrating moments. Generic interfaces structure behaviour and produce modes of interacting and consuming that place within the privacy of individual devices.